With the Labour government in power, it has felt as though each month brings another layer of legislation that adds pressure to the trade. Against that backdrop, it is refreshing to report a rare move in the opposite direction, with the Government tabling an amendment to deregulate sound moderators.
The Government has introduced its own amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill that would remove sound moderators from their current classification as Section 1 firearms.
For the trade, this represents a significant and long-awaited change, one that has been the subject of discussion for many years.
There is, of course, still a process to go through before this becomes law, but the direction of travel is clear. At a time when the industry is facing increasing regulatory scrutiny in other areas, this move offers a degree of balance and a reminder that proportionate, evidence-based policy is still possible.
For retailers and distributors alike, removing unnecessary licensing requirements would simplify transactions and reduce administrative burden.
It is also a practical step from a safety and environmental perspective. Sound moderators are widely recognised as a tool for reducing noise pollution and protecting hearing, both for shooters and those in surrounding areas. Their broader availability would support responsible use without compromising public safety.
Our resident specialist firearms solicitor, Laura Saunsbury, explores the detail behind these changes on page 24. Her analysis
outlines how the legislation will work in practice, what it means for dealers and certificate holders, and where some uncertainty remains, particularly around so-called dual-use accessories.
While it would be premature to celebrate until the legislation is finalised, this is undoubtedly a positive development. It is one that reflects sustained engagement from industry bodies and a growing recognition within government that not all controls deliver meaningful benefits.
The trade will welcome this development, even if it comes against a backdrop of continued regulatory pressure. It is a practical step in the right direction and one that reflects a more proportionate approach to policy.
ROB SMITH
group trade editor, Gun Trade Insider